[ad_1]
|
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | |
41.25 CAD |
-0.43% |
-0.15% |
+11.25% |
August 11, 2023 at 05:57 pm
Management of |
Discussion of processes |
CG-AA-250a.1 |
We monitor and review our processes related to high-risk chemicals and follow all applicable laws and regulations. Our process includes three steps: |
||||
Chemicals |
to maintain compliance |
1. Acknowledgement and agreement with the RSCP by suppliers and manufacturing contractors |
|||||
with restricted substances |
|||||||
2. Gathering of information on raw materials before purchase and evaluating information using the Safety Data Sheet Screening Process, certification as Eco-Passport or STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX®, and third-party |
|||||||
regulations |
|||||||
laboratory testing |
|||||||
3. Classification of raw materials under one of the following: Approved, Approved with Condition, or Rejected |
|||||||
Our processes to manage restricted substances are described in our Restricted Substances Code of Practice (RSCP) on our website and in our 2022 ESG Report: |
|||||||
Website > Responsibility > Respect for Transparency > Codes and Policies >Restricted Substances Code of Practice |
|||||||
2022 ESG Report > Environment > Our Approach >p. 13 |
|||||||
Discussion of processes |
CG-AA-250a.2 |
Gildan is committed to ensuring that its products comply with all consumer product safety laws and other regulatory requirements as those requirements become effective, providing its customers with all required |
|||||
to assess and manage |
information, and meeting customers’ individual needs. Consequently, we periodically perform a broad range of product testing at reputable and accredited third-party laboratories to ensure compliance to consumer product |
||||||
risks and/or hazards |
safety requirements. |
||||||
associated with chemicals |
Our Company-operated chemical facility is fully staffed with chemical engineers and industry specialists, allowing us greater oversight to manage risks and hazards associated with chemical products. We monitor and |
||||||
in products |
|||||||
conduct periodic reviews of high-risk chemicals as required in our Restricted Substances Code of Practice (RSCP). The RSCP describes how we handle banned and restricted substances in countries where we operate and |
|||||||
sell our products, including for compliance with CPSIA requirements, REACH (SVHC list), and applicable legislation. As per our RSCP we encourage our suppliers and manufacturing contractors to align with green chemistry |
|||||||
principles. We also include industry and NGO practices, standards, and initiatives, and our customers’ own Restricted Substances List (RSL). |
|||||||
STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX®: Gildan®, Comfort Colors®, Alstyle®, and Anvil® by Gildan® branded products are certified by the internationally recognized |
STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX® which allows producers and |
||||||
consumers to objectively assess the presence of harmful substances in textiles and apparel products based on approximately 100 human-ecological and performance-related test parameters. Achieving the STANDARD 100 |
|||||||
by OEKO-TEX® involves meeting strict standards including the absence of restricted chemicals and subjecting the supply to an annual independent validation through an accredited laboratory testing of raw materials and |
|||||||
finished products. |
|||||||
Our processes to manage restricted substances are described in our Restricted Substances Code of Practice (RSCP) on our website and in our 2022 ESG Report: |
|||||||
Website > Responsibility > Respect for Transparency > Codes and Policies >Restricted Substances Code of Practice |
|||||||
See 2022 ESG Report > Environment > Our Approach >p. 13 |
|||||||
Environmental |
Percentage of (1) Tier 1 |
CG-AA-430a.1 |
We are one of the world’s largest vertically integrated manufacturers of apparel, and approximately 90% of our total revenues come from products manufactured in our own facilities. We depend on only a small number of |
||||
Impacts in the |
supplier1 facilities and (2) |
suppliers relative to our overall supply chain. |
|||||
Supply Chain |
supplier facilities beyond |
We do not currently audit our Tier 2 suppliers for compliance with wastewater discharge permits and/or contractual agreements. However, 100% of Gildan-operated facilities are assessed for wastewater compliance. In |
|||||
Tier 1 in compliance with |
|||||||
addition, our Tier 1 facilities in the Americas sew and cut parts that are processed in our own textile facilities (Tier 2) where we measure wastewater parameters. Additionally, our third-party auditing process ensures that we |
|||||||
wastewater discharge |
|||||||
are in compliance with relevant regulatory requirements related to wastewater discharge permits and/or contractual agreements. |
|||||||
permits and/or contractual |
|||||||
agreements2 |
Environmental impacts in the supply chain |
2022 |
|||||
Percentage of Tier 1 supplier facilities in compliance with wastewater discharge permits and/or contractual agreement |
100% |
||||||
Percentage of supplier facilities beyond Tier 1 in compliance with wastewater discharge permits and/or contractual agreement |
Not applicable as we have a vertically integrated business model |
||||||
Percentage of (1) Tier 1 |
CG-AA-430a.2 |
As per CG-AA-430a.1 approximately 90% of our total revenues come from products manufactured in our own facilities. We depend on only a small number of suppliers relative to our overall supply chain. To date, 50% of our |
|||||
supplier facilities and (2) |
Tier 1 suppliers have completed the Higg FEM. |
||||||
supplier facilities beyond |
|||||||
Tier 1 that have completed |
|||||||
the Sustainable Apparel |
|||||||
Coalition’s Higg Facility |
|||||||
Environmental Module |
|||||||
- Tier 1 suppliers are defined as Gildan’s third-party manufacturing contractors where there is a commercial arrangement in place.
- Scope of this metric is related to Tier 1 suppliers who produce finished goods for Gildan.
Gildan’s 2022 ESG Report 111
Labour Conditions in the Supply Chain
(Higg FEM) assessment or an equivalent environmental data assessment
Percentage of (1) Tier 1 supplier facilities and (2) supplier facilities beyond Tier 1 that have been audited to a labour code of conduct, (3) percentage of total audits conducted by a third-party auditor
Environmental impacts in the supply chain |
2022 |
Percentage of Tier 1 supplier facilities that have completed the Sustainable Apparel Coalition’s Higg Facility Environmental Module |
50% |
(Higg FEM) assessment |
(7 out of 14 sites) |
Percentage of supplier facilities beyond Tier 1 that have completed the Sustainable Apparel Coalition’s Higg Facility Environmental |
67% |
Module (Higg FEM) assessment or an equivalent environmental data assessment |
(4 out of 6 sites) |
- When it comes to working with suppliers in manufacturing apparel, all of Gildan’s manufacturing processes are handled by Tier 1 suppliers. Those suppliers that do not have wet manufacturing processes are encouraged to use dyed yarns as raw materials. As a result, Gildan does not have any supplier facilities beyond Tier 1 that are required to complete the Sustainable Apparel Coalition’s Higg Facility Environmental Module (Higg FEM) assessment.
More details on how we manage the environmental performance of our suppliers is contained in our 2022 ESG Report: 2022 ESG Report > Environment > Our Approach >p. 13
Labour conditions in the supply chain |
2022 |
Percentage of Tier 1 supplier facilities that have been audited to a labour code of conduct |
100% |
Percentage of supplier facilities beyond Tier 1 that have been audited to a labour code of conduct |
0% |
As of 2021, we have accepted external social compliance certifications such as Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA), and Business Social Compliance Initiative (BSCI) for our third-party contractors in Asia and selected facilities in the Americas, reducing audit duplicity.
Percentage of total audits conducted by a third-party auditor |
2022 |
Percentage of total audits of supplier facilities that were performed by an independent third-party auditor |
86%* |
*The remaining 14% of the total audits were conducted by an internal corporate representative.
Tier 2 suppliers must complete a pre-audit/self-assessment questionnaire in order to validate basic EHS and labour conditions at the factory.
More detail is provided in the 2022 ESG Report and the Code of Conduct:
2022 ESG Report > Governance > Ethics and Integrity Standards > Suppliers and Contractors Standards >p. 47Website > Responsibility > Respect for Transparency > Codes and Policies >Code of Conduct
Gildan’s Code of Conduct and Social & Sustainable Compliance Guidebook guides our labour audit process:
Website > Responsibility > Resources > Codes and Policies >Social & Sustainable Compliance Guidebook
Audit methodologies and criteria
Facilities producing for Gildan will be audited to monitor the working conditions in compliance with the Gildan Code of Conduct and the benchmarks outlined in our Guidebook. Each facility is inspected and audited for compliance. Auditors must be granted access to all areas of the facility. Not granting access is a zero-tolerance issue, leading to an “access denied” status, preventing the supplier from doing business with Gildan. All non- compliances, including breaches of our Code of Conduct and/or human rights issues, are recorded and tracked in our Social Compliance platform. We also have our Monitoring Guidelines, which serve as a reference for internal auditors to use when conducting audits. The categories below describe thresholds related to non-conformance and contractor expectations related to remedial efforts.
- Minor non-conformity:Low-risk issue where improvement towards best practices is necessary. Remediation time frame: six months.
- Moderate non-conformity: Negative impact on workers’ rights and safety (non-critical). Remediation time frame: up to two months, depending on type of violation.
- Major non-conformity: Serious violation of the Gildan Code of Conduct, other codes supplier adheres to, and/or the law, resulting in a severe impact on individual rights and/or physical safety.
Remediation time frame: immediately.
Website > Responsibility > Respect for Transparency > Codes and Policies >Code of Conduct
Gildan’s 2022 ESG Report 112
METRIC |
SASB CODE |
DATA RESPONSE |
Types of audits
These are the types of audits that may be conducted in a facility:
- Announced: the exact audit date is communicated to the facility
- Semi-announced:the facility is aware that an audit will be conducted within a specific time period (a window is provided weeks before)
- Unannounced: auditors arrive directly at the facility without prior notification
Types of auditors
Audits may be conducted by our internal auditors and/or external auditors, according to the type of audit.
Audit results
Audit results are categorized from green to black based on the number and severity of the findings against our Code of Conduct and the benchmarks outlined in our Social & Sustainable Compliance Guidebook (p. 6). Green and yellow ratings may be cleared for continued business, orange and red will require improvement within a set timeframe, and a black rating (corresponds to a zero-tolerance issue which is detailed on p. 7 of our Guidebook) will result in termination of the contract once open orders are completed.
Case #1 (own facility): work contracts |
Case #2 (own facility): environment / chemical safety |
Case #1 (contractor facility): compensation |
|
Context |
Our Social Compliance Program ensures that all Company-oper- |
Our Social Compliance Program ensures that all Company-oper- |
Our Social Compliance Program ensures that third-party contrac- |
ated and contractor facilities comply with our Code of Conduct, |
ated and contractor facilities comply with our Code of Conduct, |
tors comply with our Code of Conduct, local and international |
|
local and international laws, including applicable ILO conventions |
local and international laws, including applicable ILO conventions |
laws, including applicable ILO conventions, and industry codes |
|
and industry codes, from the Worldwide Responsible Accredited |
and industry codes, from the Worldwide Responsible Accredited |
from the Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), |
|
Production (WRAP), Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (SEDEX), and |
Production (WRAP), Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (SEDEX), |
Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (SEDEX), and the Fair Labor |
|
the Fair Labor Association (FLA). |
and the Fair Labor Association (FLA). This includes ensuring that |
Association (FLA). As per our Code of Conduct, we expect that |
|
Gildan-operated sites and third-party contractors follow strict |
our third-party contractors uphold appropriate work standards |
||
guidelines related to chemical safety and hazardous material |
aligned to our Codes and Policies. These expectations include |
||
management. |
that third-party contractors shall pay workers at least the legal |
||
minimum wage or the prevailing industry wage, whichever is |
|||
higher, for regular working hours (not including overtime). Addi- |
|||
tionally, they shall timely increase the minimum wage standard |
|||
according to the local law and regulation within legally required |
|||
time limits. |
|||
Audit |
All non-compliances, including breaches of our Code of Conduct |
All non-compliances, including breaches of our Code of Conduct |
All non-compliances related to our third-party contractors, |
process |
and/or human rights issues, are recorded and tracked in our |
and/or human rights issues, are recorded and tracked in our |
including breaches of our Code of Conduct and/or human rights |
Corporate Social Responsibility data platform. Audit results |
Corporate Social Responsibility data platform. Audit results are cat- |
issues, are recorded and tracked in our Corporate Social Respon- |
|
are categorized from Green to Black based on the number |
egorized from Green to Black based on the number and severity |
sibility data platform. Audit results are categorized from Green to |
|
and severity of the findings against our Code of Conduct and |
of the findings against our Code of Conduct and the benchmarks |
Black based on the number and severity of the findings against |
|
the benchmarks outlined in our Social & Sustainable Compli- |
outlined in our Social & Sustainable Compliance Guidebook. |
our Code of Conduct and the benchmarks outlined in our Social |
|
ance Guidebook. Green and Yellow ratings may be cleared for |
Green and Yellow ratings may be cleared for continued business, |
& Sustainable Compliance Guidebook. Green and Yellow ratings |
|
continued business, Orange and Red requires improvement within |
Orange and Red requires improvement within a set timeframe, |
may be cleared for continued business, Orange and Red requires |
|
a set timeframe, and a Black rating results in termination of the |
and a Black rating results in termination of the contract once open |
improvement within a set timeframe, and a Black rating will result |
|
contract once open orders are completed. If a third-party con- |
orders are completed. If a third-party contractor or our operated |
in termination of the contract once open orders are completed. If |
|
tractor or our operated facility receives an Orange or Red rating |
facility receives an Orange or Red rating following an audit, our |
a third-party contractor or our operated facility receives an Orange |
|
following an audit, our internal Social Compliance team will work |
internal Social Compliance team will work with the facility’s man- |
or Red rating following an audit, our internal Social Compliance |
|
with the facility’s management to remediate any issues found and |
agement to remediate any issues found and establish an action |
team will work with the facility’s management to remediate any |
|
establish an action plan. The following is an example of a Minor |
plan. The following is an example of a Major non-compliance from |
issue found and establish an action plan. The following is an |
|
non-compliance Orange rating, resulting from a 2022 internal |
an internal audit with Orange rating. |
example of a Moderate non-compliance which was remediated |
|
audit in our own facilities in Nicaragua. |
accordingly as per our social compliance process. |
||
Gildan’s 2022 ESG Report 113
METRIC |
SASB CODE |
DATA RESPONSE |
|||
Case #1 (own facility): work contracts |
Case #2 (own facility): environment / chemical safety |
Case #1 (contractor facility): compensation |
|||
Case |
An important step in the auditing process is conducting documen- |
An important step in the auditing process is conducting a thorough |
Worker interviews are an integral part of the Gildan audit process |
||
tation review. Examples of some of the documents reviewed in |
facility walkthrough. The main purpose of this is to identify any |
because they provide an opportunity to validate the information |
|||
this case included the following: employee contracts, disciplinary |
present or potential non-compliances related to the facility’s |
and findings revealed through management interviews, facility in- |
|||
notices, pay-slips, payment of employee benefits, permits, and all |
day-to-day operations, as well as to guarantee worker safety and |
spections, and documentation review. During the review of payroll |
|||
required legal licenses and certifications. While conducting the |
well-being. During the facility walkthrough, the Social Compliance |
in one of our contractor facilities in Asia, our auditor identified that |
|||
documentation review, our Social Compliance team identified the |
team identified the following: |
the factory did not follow a new regulation announced by local |
|||
following: |
• The colour service / dye weighting room was in poor condi- |
government two months prior to the visit. The new regulation |
|||
involved increasing employees’ minimum wage by 12.5%, which |
|||||
• Employee contract language was too complicated to under- |
tions: disorganized, unclean and in need of housekeeping. |
||||
was verified through worker interviews. The auditor selected a |
|||||
stand, which could lead to misunderstanding or misinterpreta- |
• Lack of warning / security signs. |
||||
sample of employees, introduced the purpose of the interview, |
|||||
tion. |
|||||
As a result of these findings, a sustainable action plan for the |
informed workers of the confidential nature of the interview, |
||||
• The contract also included language such as “the employee is |
|||||
verified workers’ information, covered the aspects of the working |
|||||
facility was implemented. This plan included conducting a root |
|||||
obligated to” instead of “the employee is committed to,” which |
conditions outlined in the Gildan audit tool, and paid particular |
||||
cause analysis to identify additional measures to mitigate potential |
|||||
could potentially be misinterpreted as forced labour. |
attention to the area of concern. Regarding the auditor’s question |
||||
incidents in the future. |
|||||
about minimum wage, all the sampled workers were not aware |
|||||
• Finally, the contract did not specify whether the amount of |
|||||
that the government had increased the minimum wage standard. |
|||||
money would be compensated on a daily, weekly, or monthly |
|||||
basis. |
Root cause |
Although minor non-compliances do not require a root |
Our Social Compliance and Health & Safety departments worked |
Gildan’s Social Compliance and the third-party contractor’s Human |
|
analysis |
cause analysis, Social Compliance and Human Resources |
collaboratively to understand the cause of this problem and |
Resources departments worked collaboratively to understand the |
|
departments determined that there was an inadequate review of |
concluded that the primary root cause was inadequate planning |
cause of this problem and concluded that the facility delayed the |
||
documentation by leadership, leading to work contracts being |
and organization. In addition, the root causes were due to a lack of |
increase of the minimum wage to its workers. |
||
easily misinterpreted. |
leadership and poor supervision. |
|||
Remediation |
Gildan is committed to maintaining a fair and healthy workplace |
Gildan is committed to maintaining a safe and healthy workplace. |
To remediate this action, the third-party contractor and the Social |
|
plan |
environment. Therefore, these were the actions taken to complete |
Therefore, these were the actions taken to complete the facility’s |
Compliance department worked collaboratively to conduct the |
|
the facility’s remediation plan: |
remediation plan: |
following actions: |
||
• A complete review of employees’ contracts to ensure there is |
• A thorough cleaning and organization of the colour service / |
1. |
The contractor immediately paid all the adjustments to workers |
|
no complicated wording or phrases and avoid misunderstand- |
dye weighting room was completed. |
in compliance with updated minimum wages. |
||
ings regarding workers’ commitments with the Company. |
• All the missing warning / security signs were placed in the |
2. |
The contractor posted the notification on the bulletin board |
|
• Clearly define the rate of compensation so it can be easily |
required areas. |
regarding the increased minimum wage and announced |
||
understood by the employee. |
• The Health & Safety department made a commitment to |
the new minimum wage standard to all workers during the |
||
following weekly meeting. |
||||
undertake routine inspections to guarantee that these areas |
||||
would always be kept clean and in order. |
3. |
The contractor’s Human Resources department prepared a |
||
timeline to closely follow the latest updates on laws and regula- |
||||
tions from local government. |
||||
4. |
The contractor’s Human Resources department created a |
|||
manageable training system to timely notify all workers of the |
||||
updates regarding their compensation and benefits. |
Gildan’s 2022 ESG Report 114
METRIC |
SASB CODE |
DATA RESPONSE |
|||
Case #1 (own facility): work contracts |
Case #2 (own facility): environment / chemical safety |
Case #1 (contractor facility): compensation |
|||
Follow-up |
To monitor this non-compliance and as a general best practice, |
As a follow-up to this case and as a general best practice, our |
Our Social Compliance department will keep monitoring this |
||
our Social Compliance team reminded facility management in our |
Social Compliance team reminded facility management in our own |
matter to ensure third-party contractors continuously implement |
|||
own facilities of the importance of maintaining healthy and safe |
facilities of the importance of maintaining healthy and safe work |
sustainable improvements as required by Gildan’s Social Compli- |
|||
work environments. Amongst the practices to be completed by |
environments. Amongst the practices to be completed by the |
ance Program and statutory law. |
|||
the facility is to ensure that all work contracts, documentation, and |
facility is to ensure that all areas, especially those where chemicals |
||||
policies utilize clear and understandable wording to mitigate any |
are handled, are kept clean, and that all require warning and |
||||
risk of confusion or misinterpretation. |
security signs are kept in a visible location. |
||||
Lessons |
Our Social Compliance and Human Resources departments |
Our Social Compliance and Health & Safety departments worked |
Through constant communication and capacity-building, the |
||
learned |
worked collaboratively with facility management to identify |
collaboratively with facility management to identify sustainable |
Social Compliance team supported the third-party contractor to |
||
sustainable solutions to this issue. The facility learned the |
solutions to this issue. The facility learned that to keep a healthy |
ensure workers’ Compensation and Benefits are well managed at |
|||
importance of ensuring that all documentation implements |
work environment for workers, it must ensure that work areas are |
the facility, including, but not limited to, guaranteeing workers a |
|||
language that is easy to follow and understand in order to reduce |
organized and clean, and warning / danger signs are in place. |
minimum wage, ensuring a timely review of laws and regulations, |
|||
any potential misunderstandings and assumptions from the |
and implementing a manageable training system for employees |
||||
interested parties. |
regarding their compensation and benefits. |
||||
Remediation process
A facility is required to work on an immediate remediation plan when a serious violation of Gildan’s Code of Conduct is identified during the audit process and has caused, or may cause, a negative impact on worker safety and well-being. This remediation process involves a more systematic review. However, there may be other instances where an immediate remediation plan is requested of a facility. Examples of what should be included in a remediation process include:
- In-depthinvestigation to confirm the non-compliance
- Corrective action plan:
-
- Interviews with affected stakeholders
- Documentation review (e.g., trainings, policies, and procedures)
- Root cause analysis
Gildan’s Social Compliance team works with facility managers to provide advice and recommendations on how to best address any issues, make changes where necessary, and put in place sustainable remediation solutions that are available for review and verification. Facilities shall provide details and evidence of their remediations, which are subject to verification through follow-up audits that can be conducted on-site or through a desktop review, depending on the circumstances. Facilities are expected to implement remediation actions and to demonstrate improvements within a prescribed timeframe.
Corrective action plan
Different from a remediation process, is the Corrective Action Plan (CAP), which is an ongoing effort to ensure sustainable practices in Company-operated and third-party contractor facilities. A CAP is required for all non- compliances identified in an audit process. The following are examples of what a CAP should include, but may not be limited to:
- Photos of corrective actions
- Training attendance list
- Evidence of review of a policy / internal procedure
Follow-up
Gildan reviews remediation trends year-by-year to identify facilities that have made progress in remediation or facilities that show a lack of commitment and progress to improve working conditions. Systematic follow-ups are conducted to verify the progress made towards resolving the issues with the objective of helping the facility improve its overall performance and remain in compliance with our Code of Conduct.
Gildan’s 2022 ESG Report 115
Attachments
Original Link
Original Document
Permalink
Disclaimer
Gildan Activewear Inc. published this content on 11 August 2023 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 11 August 2023 21:56:04 UTC.
RBC Capital Markets Cuts Gildan Activewear’s Price Target | MT |
|
UBS Adjusts Price Target on Gildan Activewear to $41 From $42, Maintains Buy Rating | MT |
|
Gildan Activewear Maintained at Buy at Stifel GMP Following Second-Quarter Results; Price Target Reduced to US$38.00 | MT |
|
Gildan Activewear Upgraded to Buy at TD | MT |
|
RBC Cuts Price Target on Gildan Activewear to $36 From $40, Maintains Outperform Rating | MT |
|
Gildan Activewear Inc. Reports Earnings Results for the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended July 02, 2023 | CI |
|
Gildan Activewear Inc. announces an Equity Buyback for 8,778,638 shares, representing 5% of its issued share capital. | CI |
|
Gildan Activewear Inc. Revises Earnings Guidance for the Fiscal Year 2023 | CI |
|
Gildan Activewear Inc. Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend, Payable on September 18, 2023 | CI |
|
Gildan Activewear’s Fiscal Q2 Profit, Net Sales Fall; 2023 Outlook Revised; Dividend Declared | MT |
|
Transcript : Gildan Activewear Inc., Q2 2023 Earnings Call, Aug 03, 2023 | CI |
|
Gildan Activewear Brief: Q2 GAAP diluted EPS of US$0.87 and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.63; Lowers its FY 2023 outlook to reflect the impact of current market conditions | MT |
|
Gildan Activewear Brief: Q2 Sales of US$840 million; Announces renewal of Normal Course Issuer Bid to repurchase up to 5% of issued and outstanding shares | MT |
|
North American Morning Briefing: Stocks Face Fresh Losses; Apple, Amazon Earnings Eyed | DJ |
|
Gildan Activewear Inc. authorizes a Buyback Plan. | CI |
|
Gildan Activewear Says Its Science-based Emissions Targets Validated by SBTi | MT |
|
Gildan Activewear Brief: Says Its Science-based Emissions Targets Validated by SBTi | MT |
|
UBS on Gildan Activewear | MT |
|
National Bank Previews Gildan Activewear’s Q2 2023 Results | MT |
|
Key Takeaways From National Bank’s Annual Quebec Conf — Couche-Tard, Gildan, Metro | MT |
|
GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR INC. : Ex-dividend day for | FA |
|
RBC Capital Markets Notes Gilda Activewear’s Mixed Q1 Results | MT |
|
Declaration of Voting Results by Gildan Activewear | CI |
|
UBS Adjusts Gildan Activewear’s Price Target to $42 From $41, Maintains Buy Rating | MT |
|
RBC Lifts Price Target on Gildan Activewear to $40 From $39, Notes Outlook Reflects Improved Margin Trends, Keeps Outperform Rating | MT |
More charts
Gildan Activewear Inc. is a Canada-based, vertically integrated manufacturer of everyday basic apparel, including activewear, underwear, and hosiery products. The Company’s primary product categories include activewear tops and bottoms (activewear), socks (hosiery), underwear tops and bottoms (underwear) and intimates. Its activewear product lines include T-shirts, fleece tops and bottoms, and sports shirts. Its hosiery product lines include athletic, dress, casual and workwear socks, liner socks, socks for therapeutic purposes, sheer panty hose, tights, and leggings. Its underwear product lines include men’s and boy’s underwear (tops and bottoms) and ladies panties. The Company’s intimates product lines include ladies shapewear, intimates, and accessories. The products it manufactures, and sells are marketed under Company brands, including Gildan, American Apparel, Comfort Colors, Gildan Hammer, Alstyle and GoldToe. It also sells socks under the Under Armour brand.
More about the company

Buy
Average target price
36.02USD
Spread / Average Target
+17.33%
Consensus
Source link