Apparel Group wins CSR Award



Apparel Group’s receipt of the CSR Award is a testament of the group’s significant contributions to the community and showcases its dedication to environmental stewardship…reports Asian Lite News

Apparel Group, a leading retail fashion and lifestyle conglomerate, has been honored with the prestigious CSR Award for Exemplary Corporate Social Responsibility in the Retail category at the Qatar CSR Summit. The summit, held under the patronage of His Excellency Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Qatar, took place from May 16–18 at Qatar University. Hosted by the Qatar National Program, the awards gala dinner celebrated organizations that have demonstrated outstanding commitment to corporate social responsibility.

Apparel Group’s receipt of the CSR Award is a testament of the group’s significant contributions to the community and showcases its dedication to environmental stewardship and social welfare. As a strategic partner of UN Global Compact, Apparel Group continues its commitment to corporate social responsibility initiatives aimed at creating a positive and sustainable impact.

The summit brought together CSR experts and professionals to explore the incorporation of economic, social, and environmental goals into organizational operations. Apparel Group actively promoted its CSR activities during the summit, fostering transformative learning and exchanging best practices in the field.

Mr. Neeraj Teckchandani, CEO of Apparel Group said: “The recognition received by Apparel Group at the Qatar CSR Summit reinforces the company’s commitment to corporate social responsibility and its dedication to forging solid cross-sector collaborations. Through partnerships with organizations such as the Red Crescent and Qatar Charity, Apparel Group strives to create a positive impact on both the environment and society. As Apparel Group continues to drive sustainable practices and corporate social responsibility, the company remains dedicated to making a lasting and positive impact on the community and the environment.”

Over the years, Apparel Group has actively engaged in multiple charitable endeavors, including substantial donations to organizations such as Qatar Charity, Hamad Medical Center, DEAP, and local schools. The group has also supported meal distribution programs, promoting social welfare and addressing pressing community needs.

One of the company’s notable initiatives aligns with Qatar’s efforts to ban plastic usage, reflecting its commitment to combat plastic waste. Apparel Group has actively participated alongside multiple organizations in supporting this national endeavor, emphasizing the importance of environmental responsibility and sustainable practices.

In 2023 alone, Apparel Group has made significant strides towards sustainability including organizing beach cleanups, participating in Earth Hour initiatives, and contributing to earthquake relief funds. The company continues to champion long-term sustainable practices within the region, fostering ethical behavior, minimizing waste, and raising awareness about sustainable practices among individuals and businesses.

ALSO READ: Rolls-Royce set to cut costs

[mc4wp_form id=””]

Source link


Bilingualism inserts professionals in global


QCOSTARICA – In today’s interconnected world, having bilingual skills is becoming super valuable. Companies everywhere are looking to expand into global markets and build strong connections with people from different cultures, and they need people who can communicate in multiple languages.

According to reports from the Costa Rican Coalition of Development Initiatives (CINDE), in 2022 over 22,000 new jobs were created and, as of March 2023, another 3,500 jobs opened up that required bilingualism. And in 2022, Costa Rica was ranked 37th of a total 111 countries in the world for English proficiency – second in Latin America, followed by Cuba, Paraguay, Bolivia and Chile – according to the EF English Proficiency Index.

Read more: Government of Rodrigo Chaves breaks the agreement with CINDE

Given this reality, the issue of bilingualism becomes relevant and promotes a strategic value within companies that are or start operations in Costa Rica, since they seek that their collaborators can communicate in different languages and adapt to the changing needs of the global market.

  • Globalization: Globalization has led to an increase in trade and commercial relations between countries of different languages and cultures. As a result, there is a greater need for professionals who can communicate with people from different parts of the world in their native language.
  • Labor competence: bilingual professionals have the competitive advantage that they can communicate with a broader and more diverse audience, standing out from others who only speak one language.
  • Internationalization of companies: companies around the world are expanding with branches and subsidiaries in different countries, requiring people who can serve these markets and with the ability to interact seamlessly with the organization and customers.
  • Increased Demand for Services: As the population becomes increasingly diverse, there is an increased demand for services in different languages. Bilingual professionals are essential in sectors such as technology, health, services, education, social and government services, where communication with people of different linguistic and cultural backgrounds is required.

“A country that graduates professionals with a second language strengthens its economy, by being able to communicate effectively with international companies and clients. This can lead to increased business opportunities and therefore increased exports, foreign investment and jobs. At ULACIT, we are proud to be the only bilingual university in the country and to contribute to the fact that more than five thousand of our students have benefited from our teaching format and are now professionals in a globalized environment”, added Núñez.

The expert has noticed that Costa Rica has made strides in language management, but there’s a big demand for professionals which recruiters have been struggling to fill. This has led to a whopping 71% talent shortage – 7 out of 10 employers – as per the Manpower Group’s survey on Q2 2023 hiring expectations, making it essential that public and private institutions prioritize quality training that caters to the current labor force needs and development in order to make the country more competitive and provide better job opportunities for the younger generations.

“Globalization has accelerated this demand to be bilingual or trilingual, since there are new types of companies that allow you to work from anywhere in the world. Therefore, the solution to meet these needs is to teach quality English from preschool. Today, the labor market is pointing to multilingualism, so at ULACIT we are working, in the short term, to incorporate a third language into our study plans,” Núñez concluded.

From Read the original in Spanish here.

Source link


Elizabeth Holmes Begins Prison Sentence


Elizabeth Holmes, the once-celebrated founder of Theranos, has commenced her 11-year prison sentence in a Texas facility. This marks a significant chapter in the unravelling of the Theranos scandal, which rocked the technology and healthcare industries. The trial and subsequent sentencing of Holmes have shed light on the dangers of corporate fraud and the importance of accountability in the business world.

The Rise and Fall of Theranos

Theranos, a Silicon Valley startup founded by Elizabeth Holmes in 2003, promised to revolutionize the medical industry with its blood-testing technology. At its peak, the company was valued at billions of dollars and Holmes was hailed as a visionary entrepreneur. However, as investigations unfolded, it became apparent that Theranos’ technology was flawed and its claims were grossly exaggerated.

The Trial and Conviction

Elizabeth Holmes faced a high-profile trial, where she was charged with multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy. The prosecution presented evidence that revealed a web of deception orchestrated by Holmes and her team. Investors, doctors, and patients were misled by false claims about Theranos’ capabilities, putting lives and financial investments at risk. After a lengthy trial, Holmes was found guilty on several charges, leading to her 11-year prison sentence.

Impact on the Tech and Healthcare Industries

Read More: Elizabeth Holmes— The Rise and Fall of the Youngest Female Self-Made Billionaire in the World

The Theranos scandal has had far-reaching consequences for both the tech and healthcare sectors. It exposed the dangers of unchecked hype and the potential harm caused by unproven technologies in critical fields such as healthcare. The case served as a wake-up call for investors and regulators, prompting increased scrutiny and caution in evaluating tech startups, particularly in the healthcare space.

Lessons in Corporate Accountability

Elizabeth Holmes’ prison sentence sends a powerful message about the importance of holding corporate leaders accountable for their actions. The case serves as a reminder that individuals who engage in fraudulent practices will face legal consequences, regardless of their status or reputation. This outcome reinforces the need for robust corporate governance, transparency, and ethical decision-making to protect stakeholders and maintain trust in the business world.

Implications for Tech Innovation

The fallout from the Theranos scandal has prompted a reevaluation of the culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in the tech industry. While innovation is crucial for progress, it must be balanced with ethical considerations and responsible practices. The case has raised questions about the need for increased regulatory oversight, stricter due diligence, and a focus on delivering tangible results rather than hype.

Source link


Here’s why companies are willing to blow up their


Over the past few months, we’ve watched as major corporations such as
, Anheuser-Busch, and Target have hopped on the
train and alienated their traditional client bases as a result. Regardless of the often swift and brutal backlash they know will follow, others, including North Face, Nike, and Kohl’s, are always waiting in the wings to become the next sacrificial lamb.

It turns out there’s a reason for this counterintuitive behavior that goes far beyond virtue signaling: Companies are trying to raise their Corporate Equality Index. The more
issues a company supports, the higher their score.


A CEI is essentially a “woke” credit score that is determined by the

Human Rights Campaign
, a 501(c)(4) organization that describes itself as “the largest LGBTQ political lobbying organization within the United States.” No one will be surprised to hear that George Soros’s Open Society Foundations is HRC’s largest donor. Other donors include the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the labor unions for the National Education Association and the United Food and Commercial Workers, according to

Influence Watch

Influence Watch reports HRC’s public charity arm, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, plays an influential role in Democratic Party politics by pressuring companies to comply with its social agenda.

A company’s CEI is derived from its performance in

five areas

  1. Workforce Protections (5 points possible).
  2. Inclusive Benefits (50 points possible).
  3. Supporting an Inclusive Culture (25 points possible).
  4. Corporate Social Responsibility (20 points possible).
  5. Responsible Citizenship (-25).

Yes, you read that right. “A large-scale official or public anti-LGBTQ blemish” on a company’s record will result in the loss of 25 points. HRC explains that “scores on this criterion are based on information that has come to HRC’s attention.”

For example, Fox News, which for three years had scored 100%,

lost its perfect rating
in April 2022 after several hosts defended Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R-FL) Parental Rights in Education Act, better known as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill.


2022 report
shows that 842 corporations achieved CEIs of 100%, which earned them the apparently coveted distinction of being one of the “Best Places to Work for LGBTQ+ Equality.”

An explainer about the index published by the New York Post last month

that CEI is “a lesser-known part of the burgeoning ESG [environmental, social, and corporate governance] ‘
ethical investing’ movement
increasingly pushed by the country’s top three investment firms,” BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Bank. “ESG funds invest in companies that oppose fossil fuels, push for unionization, and stress racial and gender equity over merit in hiring and board selection.”

The New York Post reports that “HRC sends representatives to corporations every year telling them what kind of stuff they have to make visible at the company. They give them a list of demands and if they don’t follow through there’s a threat that you won’t keep your CEI score.”

James Lindsay, editor of the website New Discourses, told the New York Post, “HRC administers the CEI ranking ‘like an extortion racket, like the Mafia.’”

Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, a candidate for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination,

, “The big fund managers like BlackRock all embrace this ESG orthodoxy in how they apply pressure to top corporate management teams and boards and they determine, in many cases, executive compensation and bonuses and who gets re-elected or re-appointed to boards. They can make it very difficult for you if you don’t abide by their agendas.”

In a 2018 letter to CEOs from BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, whom Fortune magazine has dubbed the “
face of ESG
,” he emphasizes a “new model of governance” in harmony with ESG values.


, “Society is demanding that companies, both public and private, serve a social purpose. To prosper over time, every company must not only deliver financial performance, but also show how it makes a positive contribution to society. … [I]f a company doesn’t engage with the community and have a sense of purpose, it will ultimately lose the license to operate from key stakeholders.”

Fink is mistaken. Society is not demanding that companies serve a social purpose. Rather, ESG is being forced upon society by the global elites who wield it as a weapon and a control mechanism they can use to consolidate power over the masses.

The mission of the activist group Our Money, Our Values is to educate the public about the threats posed by ESG. OMOV

Derek Kreifels, the co-founder and CEO of State Financial Officers Foundation, on its front page: “ESG is a highly subjective political score infiltrating all walks of life, forcing progressive policies on everyday Americans, resulting in higher prices at the pump and at the store.”

Asked for a comment by the New York Post, Kreifels

, “The problem with measures like CEI, and its big brother ESG, is that it introduces an incentive structure outside of the bounds of business, often in ways contradictory to fiduciary duty.”

It certainly is. Corporations exist to maximize shareholder value, not to serve social purposes. The interests of shareholders of Anheuser-Busch, Disney, Target, and other companies whose executives have prioritized ESG over profits, and common sense, are clearly not being served.

If shareholders were smart, they’d take legal action to eradicate this attack on shareholder rights and American values. And even those of us who don’t have a financial stake in corporate American must understand that the culture wars are strangling us and turning the United States into a country we no longer recognize. We stop focusing on them at our peril.


Elizabeth Stauffer is a contributor to the Washington Examiner, Power Line, the Western Journal, and AFNN and is a past contributor to RedState, Newsmax, and
. Her articles have appeared on many sites, including RealClearPolitics, MSN, and the Federalist. Please follow Elizabeth on 

Source link


ROB DRAPER: Union Berlin and RB Leipzig’s success


It’s very easy to scoff at the Bundesliga if you only read the headlines and focus on the title lift. It’s inevitable of course. We’re drawn to the ecstasy and the agony, the glamour team and their sidekick.

And at the end of it all, it was difficult to know whether it was the most Borussia Dortmund moment of all time, or, the most-extreme manifestation of a Bayern Munich trope. To recap, Bayern Munich won the title: they always do. 

But they did so only with an 89th-minute Jamal Musiala goal and then indulged in an extraordinary (for any other club) public display of political blood letting, sacking CEO Oliver Kahn and sport director Hasan Salihamidžić even as the players were celebrating on the pitch at Köln.

It made Louis van Gaal’s dismissal in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 FA Cup final look the model of corporate decorum. And Dortmund? They lost: they (almost) always do, in agonising, heartbreaking fashion. 

The famous Yellow Wall stood silent as they failed to beat Mainz and news filtered back of Musiala’s goal to take the title on goal difference. They reduced manager Edin Terzic, who once stood as part of that Yellow Wall as a fan, to tears as they sang in support despite their crushed hopes.

Bayern Munich won their 11th Bundesliga title in a row after a win on Saturday afternoon

Bayern Munich won their 11th Bundesliga title in a row after a win on Saturday afternoon

Borussia Dortmund looked set on ending their top-flight title drought but ended up losing

Borussia Dortmund looked set on ending their top-flight title drought but ended up losing

It was meant to be about Dortmund finally ending 10 successive years of Bayern title wins. It was meant to be Jude Bellingham’s glorious farewell. Instead, his friend and former England teammate, Musiala, was the man in the spotlight.

It was probably the best finish to the Bundesliga since 2001, when Schalke fans celebrated on the pitch after a dramatic comeback to beat Unterhaching 5-3 and seemingly win their first ever Bundesliga title. 

In the days before smart phones and 5G, a false rumour that Bayern – yes, them again – had lost 1-0 at Hamburg swept the ground, TV reporters congratulated the coach and on-pitch celebrations ensued.

They were still ongoing when the scoreboard flickered into life to show the live feed from the still ongoing Hamburg-Bayern game, just in time to watch Patrick Anderson equalise in the 93rd minute for Bayern to go above Schalke and snatch the title.

And so a 21st century phenomenon begun to evolve. The march of technology and globalisation over 22 subsequent years and the consequent growth of the Champions League has meant that once-dominant clubs all across Europe, who might previously have been guaranteed a title win three or four times in a decade, have become unassailable.

After Schalke’s pain, Dortmund won the title in 2002 and over those 22 subsequent season there have been some glorious outliers, when Werder Bremen won in 2004, VfB Stuttgart in 2007 and VfL Wolfsburg in 2009.

There were then the two Jürgen Klopp Dortmund titles in 2011 and 2012. Stop the clock that year, and it was beginning to look a genuinely interesting league. In the ten seasons up to 2012, the Bundesliga had produced five different winners, an impressively diverse spread, even if powerhouse Bayern won five. 

And yet since then it has only been Bayern, which is why so much was invested in Dortmund not messing up on Saturday. And Dortmund aren’t exactly plucky underdogs. They’re the second biggest club in Germany. Just with the emphasis on ‘second’.

Jamal Musiala wheeled away in celebration after scoring a crucial goal in Bayern's final game

Jamal Musiala wheeled away in celebration after scoring a crucial goal in Bayern’s final game

Jurgen Klopp (left) had Dortmund challenging for league titles during his time at the club

Jurgen Klopp (left) had Dortmund challenging for league titles during his time at the club

And yet scratch below the surface and you’ll find a thriving ecosystem. Perhaps one that will never resonate in India, China and the USA like the Premier League. But one that allows supporters to dream.

The remaining Champions League places this season are made up by RB Leipzig and Union Berlin, two clubs from the old East Germany, who were both playing in the regional Oberliga in 2006. In England, there are paroxysms of excitement that Luton have made it from non league to Premier League. 

Imagine though if the top four next season were Manchester City, Manchester United, Salford City and Luton. With Crystal Palace in fifth. 

Because Saturday’s German Cup final will be between RB Leipzig – famously a corporate manifestation backed by the late Dietrich Mateschitz of Red Bull fame who bankrolled the rise from non league to Champions League – and fifth-placed SC Freiburg, a yo-yo Bundesliga club, 100 per cent owned by its members. 

They share that DNA with Union Berlin, a club that came close to being drowned by the the wave of capitalism that swept the old DDR when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, almost went bankrupt, survived a scandal over Stasi links to the ownership and has slowly rebuilt itself with smart recruitment, without a sugar daddy owner.

Last year Eintracht Frankfurt won the Europa League, regularly taking 30,000 fans to away games. They knocked out West Ham in the semi finals and they so successfully took over Camp Nou that Barcelona have since instituted one of the most restrictive ticketing policies in Europe to prevent it happening again.

The average attendance in the Bundesliga this season was 42996. The world’s greatest league? 40,301. So, yes, the Bundesliga has become a procession at the top. But curiously there isn’t a groundswell of anger among fans at other clubs. 

Where England has a big six – perhaps seven now Newcastle has been chosen to sportswash the human rights crimes of Saudi Arabia – Germany has a Big One. But that means it is a veritable land of opportunity for mid-sized or even non-league clubs.

Union Berlin's Christopher Trimmel celebrates with a fake Champions League trophy after the club ensured their place in the competition next year

Union Berlin’s Christopher Trimmel celebrates with a fake Champions League trophy after the club ensured their place in the competition next year

There are similarities with Union Berlin's success with the story of newly promoted Luton Town

There are similarities with Union Berlin’s success with the story of newly promoted Luton Town

Talking with Steve Parish last year about his ownership of Crystal Palace, very much a model mid-sized club, he bemoaned the fact that it was difficult to point to tangible successes other than survival. 

And this from a club that were 12 minutes away from winning the FA Cup in 2016 and had a Wembley day out in the semi-final last season. 

Yet right now, you would much rather be a Sheffield Wednesday fan than Palace. The emotional rewards are much richer.

Brighton and Brentford have shown how much you can do with a domestic owner with deep pockets and a smart strategy. But these are not homespun stories of organic growth. 

Professional gambler Tony Bloom has burnt through £400m to make loss-making Brighton sixth and the object of desire for any right-minded romantic.

Nothing can match the globalised power of the Premier League. And something surely needs to shift in the power dynamic of the Bundesliga. 

Yet strip away the surface glitz, and ignore the confetti canons of the title lift. 

If you are what the US hedge funds call a ‘legacy fan’ with the luck or imagination to support a team outside the Big Six, it might actually be more fun to compete in the Bundesliga.

Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parrish has revealed the difficulties of scaling up a football club

Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parrish has revealed the difficulties of scaling up a football club

Jose’s Comeback Years 

Guess who’s back? Back again. Jose’s back. Tell a friend.

To fans of a certain vintage, who recall the 2003 UEFA Cup final – the competition that became the Europa League – there is a glorious familiarity to tonight’s final between Roma and Sevilla.

Remember the spluttering indignation of Celtic manager Martin O’Neill at the time-wasting, injury-feigning, knee-clutching-as-they-rolled-around-on-the-pitch Porto team, who won 3-2 in extra time? 

Who was the devilish, handsome young coach who had taken game management to new levels (depths?) and would we see much more of his antics on the European stage, we wondered? 

The wailing and gnashing of teeth coming from Leverkusen earlier this month after Roma’s semi final win over Bayer, 1-0 on aggregate, with 28 per cent possession, told you that Jose was back in town. 

If his life was a five-act play, there would be The Translator Years, The Glory Years, The ‘Bad Jose’ Years and now we’re in The Comeback Years. 

Who knows what the fifth act will bring? Whatever, it will be box office of a kind. 

Just don’t expect the football to be the star tonight.

Jose Mourinho will be looking to win back-to-back European trophies with Roma on Thursday

Jose Mourinho will be looking to win back-to-back European trophies with Roma on Thursday

Source link


EU sustainability directive: What UK and global


As the European Parliament goes to a full plenary vote on a major new sustainability directive introducing tighter regulations are requirements are measurement and reporting. Jeff Sacre,  Suzanne Curry and Randy Mott of non-profit trade organisations CHWMEG explains what this means for UK PLC. 

white red and green map

A landmark EU Directive set to be passed in early June and adopted later this year will hold thousands of companies around the world responsible for all adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their actions throughout their chain of activities inside and outside Europe. The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), as it’s called, is one of the most ambitious projects undertaken by the EU in the realm of environmental corporate accountability, and promises to seriously shake things up for businesses.

Companies affected by the directive will now have to conduct mandatory audits of all vendors or suppliers involved in their “chain of activities” – meaning anything from product manufacturing to waste disposal – to ensure that environmental and human rights standards are being met every step of the way. If any direct or indirect supplier is found to have adversely impacted the environment, companies will be liable for clean-up costs, proportionate to their involvement at the facility.

But that’s not all. The Directive adds that if an audit finds that any direct or indirect supplier is at risk of causing an adverse impact, companies will be required to attempt to assist those deficient suppliers to reach the Directive’s requirements. Basically, companies will be responsible for offering a certain percentage of the financial sum needed to repair whatever that supplier needs fixed, based on whatever percentage their business with that facility accounts for.

In sum, companies will not only be liable for damages caused by vendors and facilities in Europe and throughout the world, but for preventing them too. The new rules principally apply to EU-based companies – aroundt 50,000 firms will be affected – but also target non-EU companies active in the EU with a turnover rate of at least €150 million within Europe.

So how will it affect British firms?

An analysis by financial data firm Refinitiv estimates that of the approximately 10,000 foreign companies about to be hit by the directive, 11% of these are British.

The UK may no longer be an EU member state since January 2020, but it remains one of the EU’s most important trading partners. In 2022, the UK exported £340 billion of goods and services to the EU, a sum representing 42% of total UK exports (a drop from pre-Brexit levels when the EU accounted for nearly 50% of all UK foreign trade, but a hefty percentage nonetheless). 

British firms have a presence throughout the EU and thus will be subject to the new Directive. This, at first, may seem like an additional headache. But we have good news. Because the UK, unlike the EU, has an important history of robust environmental waste management due diligence practices, British businesses may actually have a leg up.

In terms of sustainability, downstream waste management is arguably one of the most important and impactful parts of a company’s chain of activities. In the UK, waste due diligence efforts have been the norm since they were first mandated by the 1990 Environmental Protection Act. Companies that generate waste are responsible for knowing exactly what happens to their waste.

This means that as a best management practice, firms that have contracts with waste treatment facilities (or their transport sister companies) conduct regular audits to assess how safely they dispose of or recycle their waste. That’s not the case in the EU, where industrial waste management contracts are usually done through a brokerage system, by which firms have contracts with a single vendor who arranges the waste disposal with third parties, meaning waste generators often have no idea where their waste goes and how it’s handled.

As a waste management trade association with a global presence, we have seen, firsthand, how familiar UK facilities are with this auditing protocol whenever we’ve conducted on-site reviews for clients, as opposed to the confusion we often encounter at EU facilities. So UK businesses should have the knowledge and experience to carry out the downstream due diligence now required by the Directive. That said, they may not have been conducting these in Europe. They’ll have to start now.

blue and white flags on pole

According to the current drafts of the law, they will now have to do the following:

Identify each supplier and vendor they use in the EU, then create a means by which they can assess risks posed by their suppliers in a number of categories, namely in terms of employees, local communities and the environment.

They will have to produce annual reports detailing supply-chain risks, listing these by order of importance, and create plans stipulating how they will approach suppliers to request they make the appropriate changes to their operations or facilities to decrease risks. There is a strong possibility companies will then also be required to financially assist in, or cover the costs of, suppliers or vendors making the necessary changes to reduce their risks.

And they will have to conduct on-site audits of all suppliers and vendors every two years, using third-party, independent bodies. Certificates do not count as due diligence. In the intermediate year, companies will have to conduct an online review, also using a third-party, independent body.

The CHWMEG organization and others like it, including the UK’s Waste Facilities Audit Association (WFAA), have been conducting third-party audits of waste vendors and facilities for decades at competitive prices which, in both the short and long term, help businesses stay on top of their environmental stewardship and avoid paying extravagant remediation costs down the line.

It is imperative that UK companies begin assessing their suppliers in the EU now in order to determine whether they need to support them to reduce their risks, or replace them with other suppliers. They should know there are tools to help them.

More on corporate sustainability: 

The positive case for ESG and why the USA is in danger of getting it wrong

Packaging Extended Producer Accountability explained

Consumers believe ESG should now be mandatory

85% of global companies are failing to cut flying emissions

Images: Christian Lue (Top) / Guillaume Périgois (Middle)

Source link


FI’s Irrefutable Commitment To The Most Vulnerable


It was said for a long time that it was just a passing fad, but time has shown that this is not the case. The truth is that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a fundamental element for companies in Mexico and around the world. In this sense, the pharmaceutical industry is no stranger to this approach, since it has a significant impact on people’s health and well-being.

As we know, CSR demands that companies of all kinds assume an ethical commitment and actively contribute to the sustainable development of the society in which they operate. In the case of the pharmaceutical industry, the duty is greater, because its mission is to provide health through its research and medical innovations.

But despite what many might think, it is not only about providing quality medicines and treatments, but also going further and supporting the communities most in need, which in countries like Mexico are many.

Pharmaceuticals united for a single purpose

During the pandemic, we witnessed how pharmaceutical companies from around the world came together as a scientific community, accelerated their work and focused on research for the creation of vaccines and treatments to combat the disease that emerged at the end of 2019 caused by the new coronavirus, Covid-19.

We all know the results were very positive and were done in a record time of just a few months, in a process that usually takes a decade or even more; thus, a series of anti-Covid vaccines were developed, produced and distributed throughout the world to combat it, in addition to a few medicines that have already begun to be used to treat the sick.

We cannot fail to mention that despite the joint effort, each pharmaceutical company also worked on their own developments, which is why we saw a handful of vaccines emerge from different latitudes, some of them even in collaboration, such as that of Pfizer-BioNtech, to mention one case.

As we see, pharmaceutical companies have the ability to use their resources, experience and global reach to address health challenges and social commitments. Through CSR programs, these companies can make a significant difference in people’s lives, as well as improve access to health care and necessary resources.

“Under the shelter of Novartis”

Novartis, of Swiss origin, is a leading pharmaceutical company worldwide. The firm has demonstrated its commitment to CSR in Mexico through various initiatives that seek to benefit vulnerable communities. It is enough to remember his campaign “Under the shelter of Novartis”, which began in 2004, where company personnel -who offered their participation voluntarily in their free time- went to poor communities in our country to distribute blankets in cold weather. .

This pharmaceutical company has reaffirmed its commitment to promote access to quality medical care and medicines in the country. To this end, the company has implemented various initiatives to address the needs of the most vulnerable communities and ensure that they have access to essential treatments.

One prominent example is the “Acceso Novartis” program, which focuses on providing affordable medicines for patients with chronic diseases. Through this initiative, Novartis seeks to reduce economic barriers and facilitate access to vital treatments and improve adherence to treatment, thereby improving the quality of life of thousands of people in Mexico.

Promotion of sustainable practices

Also, sustainability and environmental protection are key elements in the recent actions of Novartis México in terms of CSR. The company has implemented policies and programs to reduce its environmental footprint and promote sustainable practices in all its operations.

In particular, Novartis has placed an emphasis on reducing energy and water consumption, proper waste management and mitigation of carbon emissions. In addition, the pharmaceutical company promotes environmental education and ecological awareness among its employees and various audiences.

These actions, among others, demonstrate that the pharmaceutical industry can go beyond its core role and use its resources and expertise to make a positive difference in people’s lives. Also, they can contribute to the construction of a more just and equitable society, where access to medical care and social support are a reality for all.

7 pharmaceutical companies 7

In this sense, the business magazine Executive World released its list of the 100 companies that have shown that they take CSR seriously and fully commit, seven of which belong to the pharmaceutical industry and are active members of the National Chamber of the Pharmaceutical Industry (Canifarma).

To determine if a company meets the necessary characteristics to be recognized with the CSR badge, 40 items divided into the following five sections are used: 1) Quality of life in the company, 2) Business ethics, 3) Link and commitment to the community, 4) Environment and 5) Economic factor.

The seven pharmaceutical companies included in the 2022 list, according to the position they occupy, are the following:


• AstraZeneca,

• Sanofi,

• Bristol Myers Squibb,

• Novartis,

• Roche and

• Bayern.

Unwavering social commitment

According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), companies that assume their social responsibility have the following characteristics: “They take into consideration the repercussions that their activities have on society, in which they affirm the principles and values ​​by which they govern, both in their own internal methods and processes, and in relation to the other actors”.

To conclude, however, CSR is a voluntary undertaking that only depends on the company in question, and refers to activities that go beyond mere compliance with the law, but which is understood as a commitment to its environment and to society in general. . In the case of pharmaceutical companies, due to their nature focused on providing health, the duty to others is even greater.

Reforms to the health system are published in the DOF

It finally appeared published and its effects are already beginning to be felt. He Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF) published on Monday, May 29, the decree by which the Insabi disappears and its functions are integrated into the IMSS-Welfare. In this way, various provisions of the General Health Law (LGS) are reformed, added and repealed, to regulate the Health System for Well-being (SSB). It entered into force yesterday, Tuesday May 30.

Let us remember that on April 25, the Plenary of the Chamber of Deputies approved the draft decree, which was sent to the Senate of the Republic for its constitutional effects, with which, however, the Insabi disappears -which at the beginning of 2020 had replaced Seguro Popular- and its functions are integrated into the IMSS-Welfare.

The published decree details that the health services of the IMSS-Bienestar will collaborate with the Ministry of Health (SSa) regarding the free provision of health services, medicines and other associated supplies required by people without social security.

In this context, in theory, the governments of the federal entities will assist in the operation and strengthening of the National Health System (SNS), which configures that the SSB is now made up of: the SSa, Health Services of the IMSS-Welfare, as well as the institutions and organizations that participate in it and, in addition, concurrently by the federal entities.

It is important to mention that said decree expressly prohibits the collection of recovery fees for the provision of health services, medicines and other supplies associated with people without social security.

Let’s see what this new design of the health system, done on the knees, results in. As we know, the Insabi did not work -so much so that now it rests in the cemetery- and now this government is betting everything on the IMSS-Welfare “pulling the ox out of the ravine”, to see what happens with this cuatrotero health model, but the outlook, initially, is not rosy.

The AME, included in the LER

Cur-AME, Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation Mexico, announced that Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) has been included in the List of Rare Diseases (LER) of the General Health Council (CSG), which means that public health institutions health should provide multidisciplinary care to patients with SMA.

It should be said that SMA is a congenital neuromuscular disease that damages the motor neurons of the spinal cord, which causes progressive muscle weakness, due to the deficiency of the SMN1 gene. In short, it is a highly disabling disease that affects all muscles, including the respiratory muscles.

Worldwide, it affects one in 10,000 people, while one in 40 people are carriers. SMA has become the main cause of death in genetic diseases in children under two years of age, especially for not having a correct diagnosis in early stages and treatment, for which it is essential to include this condition in neonatal screening.

Given this, CurAME has promoted internal registries of people with SMA among their communities through which they seek to have an estimate of the population of people with this condition, since currently in Mexico there is no official registry that generates reliable figures on incidence, prevalence and mortality of SMA, in addition to allowing medical and social care interventions focused on this population group.

Treatments for SMA that have a sanitary registry in Mexico were included in the National Compendium of Health Supplies (CNIS), which allows the availability of such treatments for public health institutions.

Thus, the next efforts should be aimed at achieving the inclusion of treatments in the catalogs of public health institutions to make access effective, as well as to move towards a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to SMA. In addition to this, it is necessary to give greater visibility to this disease so that it is known and recognized by all.

But the inclusion of SMA in the LER is very good news. Congratulations.

the first aid kit

  • According to the lawyer Javier Coello Trejo, who is one of the plaintiffs, there are already 17 complaints against the Undersecretary of Health, former czar of the pandemic, Hugo López-Gatell, for the deaths registered during the health emergency due to the new Covid-19 disease. 19. We’ll see how this soap opera ends.
  • The INAH, again to the old ways. There are already reports of the destruction of an old aqueduct in one of the drainage rehabilitation works in the Historic Center of Puebla, which has exposed the lack of INAH supervision in an area that belongs to the monumental zone of the Puebla capital. . Therefore, the INAH has had an unsuccessful intervention in this project, because institute officials would have tried to make undue charges -of four million pesos- for a task that corresponds to them as part of their work. Like this or more corruption?
Source link


American IRA Discusses 5 Reasons to Consider a


American IRA Discusses 5 Reasons to Consider a Self-Directed Traditional IRA – Globalization News Today – EIN Presswire

Trusted News Since 1995

A service for global professionals
Wednesday, May 31, 2023


3+ Million Readers

News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools

Press Releases

Events & Conferences

Source link


God is in the details


God is in the details

Why is it that when we talk of Manila as an important, cosmopolitan, capital city, we do so in the past tense? Is it because Manila is lost in the group of cities that now form the National Capital Region?

Spanish Manila was contained within (Intra) the walls (Muros), while districts outside (Extra-muros) were suburbs or arrabales: Binondo, Ermita, Malate, Paco, Pandacan, Quiapo, Sampaloc, San Miguel, and Tondo. Old Manila disappeared not because of “New Manila” in Quezon City, it was diluted when joined by suburbs and other areas into “Greater Manila” in the last century. Today’s Metropolitan Manila includes Caloocan, Las Piñas, Makati, Malabon, Mandaluyong, Marikina, Muntinlupa, Navotas, Parañaque, Pasay, Pasig, Pateros, Quezon City, San Juan, Taguig, and Valenzuela.

Manila in the 18th century was not a hick, backwater town but a bustling port city in the heyday of the Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade, which has been rightly identified as marking the first globalization. The vignettes on the 1734 Murillo Velarde map of the Philippines depict different types of people and different ethnicities in Manila. Aside from Christianized and indigenous Filipinos, Spaniards, and Chinese (from heathen to Hispanicized and Christianized), there were Indians, Japanese, Armenians, Mughals; people from Ternate, Tidore, the Malabar Coast, and even Cafres or East Africans from Portuguese slave markets.

Long after the end of the Galleon Trade in 1815, Manila remained a busy port city as evidenced by advertisements in the revolutionary newspaper La Independencia, which came in three languages: Spanish, Tagalog, and English. La Independencia ran from September 1898 to November 1899, the turbulent period that saw not just the Philippine Revolution, but the passing of the islands from Spanish to American colonization. These two empires, Spain in decline and the United States on the rise, refused to recognize Emilio Aguinaldo and the still-born Malolos Republic when they drafted the terms for the end of the Spanish-American War. On Dec. 10, 1898, the Treaty of Paris was signed. Spain sold the Philippines to the US for $20 million.

Initially, I looked at the few English ads in La Independencia for the shift in language, then the content. One announced the sale of 2,000 Philippine butterflies, preserved and individually filed in envelopes. Contact was Mateo Gutierrez of Bacolor, Pampanga. Blank notebooks and stationery were also available in Bacolor from Ceferino Joven, a correspondent of the newspaper. Another item that caught my eye was violins that would cost a fortune today: “Notice. Excellent ‘Stradivarius’ fiddles have been recently received, as well as superior cords for violins, guitars, and bandores [bandurrias?], mane (cordas), fiddle bows, fiddlesticks of different prices, and further requisites for string and wind instruments. Isla del Romero Street Number 2, Santa Cruz. Benitez and Co.”

An influx of American soldiers, merchants, preachers, teachers, and colonial administrators required housing. The best ones were located outside Intramuros. “To Let. A newly painted house at the seashore with good rooms and shower bath. 36 Carina St., Ermita.” Longer ads were in English and betray thought in Spanish or Tagalog: “Important por sale or to let a pretty Country’s house of two footings wish galeries and a large ground wish a fine garden. Handsome baths, potables water, excellent inhodoro, and all other kind of accomodations. Distance from the Walled City, sparingly 10 minutes. Apply to Palmera Street, no. 0 Sampaloc.”

The ads are examples of early Philippine English: “The undersigned undertakes to construct all sorts of buildings boxes, but make a specialty in cigar boxes, carpenter and seller of all kinds of Philippines Wood. T. Sampedro y Fernandez y Cia. No. 1 Globo de Oro, Quiapo, Manila.”

Previous historians ignored La Independencia ads as trivial, even if they help reconstruct daily life in the early American period. Curious historians can use even ephemera like discarded cigarette wrappers and lotto tickets as keys to the past. Seemingly insignificant data may become relevant after a second, closer, look for God is indeed in the details.

Comments are welcome at [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Read Next

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of Cebudailynews. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

Source link


CAPPA seeks support for farmers to grow food crops


The Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA) has called on governments across the country to provide support for farmers to boost agricultural production. Speaking at an event to herald the World No Tobacco Day, the Executive Director of CAPPA, Mr Akinbode Oluwafemi said this has become necessary to help their transition from tobacco to crop farming.

World No Tobacco Day is marked every May 31, as set aside by the World Health Organisation to call attention to the ills of tobacco cultivation and consumption. The theme of this year’s celebration is ‘We need Food, Not Tobacco”

Speaking during the programme, Mr Oluwafemi called on governments to include financial aid, affordable agricultural loans and insurance products as parts of their programmes  to help the farmers and protect them from unforeseen losses.

He added that during a recent trip to the Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State, the main tobacco growing belt in the southwest region, the farmers shared their experiences expressed their frustration in getting government’s assistance to support their transition efforts.

He observed that the stories told by the former tobacco farmers highlight the regrettable truth of how the tobacco industry often treats these crucial contributors to their global supply chain as disposables. CAPPA, therefore, called on the government to Investigate the disengagement contracts the British American Tobacco (BAT) Nigeria signed with local tobacco farmers in view of a breach of the terms which some of the farmers alleged.

CAPPA also called for an audit of the total acreage allocated to tobacco farming in Oke Ogun, and the entire country to help the government determine the level of damage done to the environment. It also called for a verifiable afforestation programme in the entire Oke Ogun axis to make up for decades of depleted ecosystem.

In its eight-point suggestions, the non-governmental organization called on governments at all levels to set up and support the establishment of Farmers’ cooperatives to bolster their collective bargaining power when negotiating prices for crops and insulate them against market fluctuations.

It called for support of crop diversification programmes that can provide farmers with alternatives to tobacco farming, such as provision of resources to farmers to grow crops that are not only profitable but also sustainable and beneficial for the health of the land and people.

According to it, investment in local infrastructure such as irrigation systems, storage facilities, and transportation networks to aid the farming community would go a long way to helping farmers. It restated its stand on the harmful realities of tobacco cultivation which involves the use of pesticides that are harmful to tobacco growers, to the cutting and burning of trees for tobacco curing which leads to deforestation (about 3.5 million hectares of land are destroyed each year).

Also, CAPPA’s director of programmes, Mr. Philip Jakpor, emphasized that World No Tobacco Day “ is commemorated to raise awareness about the harms caused by tobacco products to people, public health, communities, the environment, and as recent evidence has shown, to the climate.”

He added that “The commemoration draws attention to the widespread prevalence of tobacco use and to its negative health effects, which currently lead to more than eight million deaths each year worldwide, including 1.2 million as the result of non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke.”

He said the WHO is raising awareness about the ways the tobacco industry interferes with attempts to substitute tobacco growing with sustainable crops, thereby contributing to the existing global food crisis.

He observed that “For us at CAPPA, the theme (We need Food, Not Tobacco) aligns with our conviction, which is supported by science, that tobacco cultivation processes from clearing of large tracts of land, cutting of trees for tobacco curing, and cigarette manufacturing, also contribute to the climate crisis and ultimately, threaten food security.”

He, therefore called on government to accelerate the implementation of Articles 17 and 18 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC) and its guidelines that outline how farmers can be supported from tobacco growing to sustainable alternative crops.

Post Views: 0



Source link